Comparison of the boundary‐lubricating ability of bovine synovial fluid, lubricin, and Healon

GD Jay, K Haberstroh, CJ Cha - Journal of biomedical materials …, 1998 - Wiley Online Library
GD Jay, K Haberstroh, CJ Cha
Journal of biomedical materials research, 1998Wiley Online Library
Purified human umbilical hyaluronate and a commercial preparation of rooster comb
hyaluronate (Healon®) intended for intra‐articular viscosupplementation did not
demonstrate the same degree of boundary‐lubricating ability as bovine synovial fluid or its
purified lubricating mucin, lubricin (p< 0.01). Boundary lubrication was measured in vitro in
an arthrotripsometer oscillating natural latex against polished glass under a load of 0.35
MPa with an entraining velocity of 0.37 mm/s. The two hyaluronate solutions possessed the …
Abstract
Purified human umbilical hyaluronate and a commercial preparation of rooster comb hyaluronate (Healon®) intended for intra‐articular viscosupplementation did not demonstrate the same degree of boundary‐lubricating ability as bovine synovial fluid or its purified lubricating mucin, lubricin (p < 0.01). Boundary lubrication was measured in vitro in an arthrotripsometer oscillating natural latex against polished glass under a load of 0.35 MPa with an entraining velocity of 0.37 mm/s. The two hyaluronate solutions possessed the same hyaluronate concentration as synovial fluid, but Healon was 4.5 times more viscous. Present practice of viscosupplementation therapy for degenerative joint disease is limited and fails to implicate the important role of synovial mucin. Boundary lubrication provided by synovial mucin, independent of its viscosity, is not replicated by hyaluronate hydrogels. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res, 40, 414–418, 1998.
Wiley Online Library