Regulation of plasminogen activator inhibitor‐1 secretion by urokinase and tissue plasminogen activator in rat epithelioid‐type smooth muscle cells

HKF Lau, J Ho - British journal of haematology, 2002 - Wiley Online Library
HKF Lau, J Ho
British journal of haematology, 2002Wiley Online Library
Tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and urokinase (uPA) are targets of plasminogen
activator inhibitor‐1 (PAI‐1) inhibition. We have previously shown that both proteases can
also induce PAI‐1 secretion in rat smooth muscle cells (SMCs). We now report that both
proteases appear to use very similar cellular mechanisms for signal transduction. They
induced PAI‐1 secretion using a pathway (s) involving protein kinase C (PKC). They also
activated the Raf/Mek/mitogen‐activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, which lies …
Summary
Tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and urokinase (uPA) are targets of plasminogen activator inhibitor‐1 (PAI‐1) inhibition. We have previously shown that both proteases can also induce PAI‐1 secretion in rat smooth muscle cells (SMCs). We now report that both proteases appear to use very similar cellular mechanisms for signal transduction. They induced PAI‐1 secretion using a pathway(s) involving protein kinase C (PKC). They also activated the Raf/Mek/mitogen‐activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, which lies downstream of PKC activation. Activation of protein kinase A (PKA), however, lowered PAI‐1 secretion induced by uPA and tPA, as a result of an inhibition of the PKC pathway and inhibition of Raf, Mek and MAPK phosphorylations. Src and syk family non‐receptor tyrosine kinases (TK) were also involved in PAI‐1 induction. The mechanisms of interaction of these tyrosine kinases with other pathways appeared to be quite different: src appeared to act within the PKC and PKA pathways, while syk operated independently of these pathways. Furthermore, whereas src inhibition resulted in inhibition of Raf/Mek/Erk phosphorylations, syk inhibition could only inhibit Mek and Erk phosphorylations but not the phosphorylation of Raf. These multiple pathways utilized by uPA and tPA to modulate PAI‐1 secretion might be involved in determining the proteolytic or antiproteolytic potential of the SMCs under different pathophysiological conditions.
Wiley Online Library